2012 Jaguar XF vs. 2013 GMC Yukon
To start off, 2013 GMC Yukon is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2012 Jaguar XF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2012 Jaguar XF would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 GMC Yukon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 GMC Yukon (327 HP) has 56 more horse power than 2012 Jaguar XF. (271 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 GMC Yukon should accelerate faster than 2012 Jaguar XF.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Jaguar XF (600 Nm) has 102 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 GMC Yukon. (498 Nm). This means 2012 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 GMC Yukon.
Compare all specifications:
2012 Jaguar XF | 2013 GMC Yukon | |
Make | Jaguar | GMC |
Model | XF | Yukon |
Year Released | 2012 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3000 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 271 HP | 327 HP |
Torque | 600 Nm | 498 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | 6-speed shiftable automatic | CVT |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4961 mm | 5131 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1877 mm | 2007 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1461 mm | 1954 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2908 mm | 2946 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 93 L |