2012 Jaguar XF vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2012 Jaguar XF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2012 Jaguar XF would be higher.
Because 2012 Jaguar XF is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Jaguar XF. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Countryman, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Jaguar XF (600 Nm) has 360 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Countryman. (240 Nm). This means 2012 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Countryman. 2012 Jaguar XF has automatic transmission and 2013 Mini Countryman has manual transmission. 2013 Mini Countryman will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Jaguar XF will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2012 Jaguar XF | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
Make | Jaguar | Mini |
Model | XF | Countryman |
Year Released | 2012 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 271 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 600 Nm | 240 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | 6-speed shiftable automatic | 6-speed manual |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4961 mm | 4110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1877 mm | 1996 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1461 mm | 1561 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2908 mm | 2595 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 47 L |