2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 2006 Rover 75
To start off, 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Rover 75. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Rover 75 would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Rover 75 (256 HP) has 69 more horse power than 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (187 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Because 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Rover 75. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee (320 Nm) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Rover 75. (245 Nm). This means 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Rover 75.
Compare all specifications:
| 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 2006 Rover 75 | |
| Make | Jeep | Rover |
| Model | Grand Cherokee | 75 |
| Year Released | 2012 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2987 cc | 4601 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 187 HP | 256 HP |
| Torque | 320 Nm | 245 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4859 mm | 4800 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1958 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1755 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2916 mm | 2750 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 65 L |
