2012 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2010 Holden Calais
To start off, 2012 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Holden Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Holden Calais would be higher. Both 2012 Jeep Wrangler and 2010 Holden Calais are equipped with a 3,600 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Jeep Wrangler (285 HP) has 7 more horse power than 2010 Holden Calais. (278 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2012 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 2010 Holden Calais.
Because 2012 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Holden Calais. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Jeep Wrangler (352 Nm) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden Calais. (350 Nm). This means 2012 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden Calais. 2010 Holden Calais has automatic transmission and 2012 Jeep Wrangler has manual transmission. 2012 Jeep Wrangler will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Holden Calais will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2012 Jeep Wrangler | 2010 Holden Calais | |
Make | Jeep | Holden |
Model | Wrangler | Calais |
Year Released | 2012 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3600 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 285 HP | 278 HP |
Torque | 352 Nm | 350 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | 6-speed manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |