2012 Kia Cee'd vs. 1980 Mazda 323
To start off, 2012 Kia Cee'd is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 1,591 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Kia Cee'd is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Kia Cee'd weights approximately 442 kg more than 1980 Mazda 323.
Because 1980 Mazda 323 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Mazda 323. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Kia Cee'd, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2012 Kia Cee'd | 1980 Mazda 323 | |
Make | Kia | Mazda |
Model | Cee'd | 323 |
Year Released | 2012 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1591 cc | 1415 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1317 kg | 875 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4050 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2320 mm |