2012 Land Rover LR4 vs. 1980 Toyota Corolla
To start off, 2012 Land Rover LR4 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Toyota Corolla. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Toyota Corolla would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Land Rover LR4 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Land Rover LR4 weights approximately 1678 kg more than 1980 Toyota Corolla.
Because 2012 Land Rover LR4 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Toyota Corolla. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Land Rover LR4 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2012 Land Rover LR4 | 1980 Toyota Corolla | |
| Make | Land Rover | Toyota |
| Model | LR4 | Corolla |
| Year Released | 2012 | 1980 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5000 cc | 1288 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 375 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | 6-speed shiftable automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2548 kg | 870 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4829 mm | 4060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1915 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1882 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2885 mm | 2410 mm |
