2012 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 2002 Mazda AZ
To start off, 2012 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mazda AZ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mazda AZ would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1834 kg more than 2002 Mazda AZ.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2012 Land Rover Range Rover | 2002 Mazda AZ | |
| Make | Land Rover | Mazda |
| Model | Range Rover | AZ |
| Year Released | 2012 | 2002 |
| Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5000 cc | 657 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 375 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 2584 kg | 750 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4973 mm | 3400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2035 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1877 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2891 mm | 2370 mm |
