2012 Mazda 3 vs. 2011 Mazda 5
To start off, 2012 Mazda 3 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2011 Mazda 5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2011 Mazda 5 would be higher. Both 2012 Mazda 3 and 2011 Mazda 5 are equipped with a 2,500 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda 3 (167 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2011 Mazda 5. (157 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 2011 Mazda 5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Mazda 5 weights approximately 167 kg more than 2012 Mazda 3.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mazda 3 (228 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Mazda 5. (221 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2012 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Mazda 5.
Compare all specifications:
2012 Mazda 3 | 2011 Mazda 5 | |
Make | Mazda | Mazda |
Model | 3 | 5 |
Year Released | 2012 | 2011 |
Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2500 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 167 HP | 157 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 228 Nm | 221 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | 5-speed automatic | 5-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1383 kg | 1550 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4506 mm | 4585 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1755 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1471 mm | 1615 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2639 mm | 2751 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.4 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.8 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 60 L |