2012 Mazda 3 vs. 2012 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, both 2012 Mazda 3 and 2012 Nissan X-Trail were released in the same year (2012). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda 3 (167 HP) has 19 more horse power than 2012 Nissan X-Trail. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 2012 Nissan X-Trail.
Because 2012 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Mazda 3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2012 Mazda 3 | 2012 Nissan X-Trail | |
| Make | Mazda | Nissan |
| Model | 3 | X-Trail |
| Year Released | 2012 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2500 cc | 1995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 167 HP | 148 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | 6-speed manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4506 mm | 4640 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1755 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1471 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2639 mm | 2640 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 65 L |
