2012 Mazda BT-50 vs. 2011 Peugeot RCZ
To start off, 2012 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2011 Peugeot RCZ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2011 Peugeot RCZ would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Peugeot RCZ (163 HP) has 22 more horse power than 2012 Mazda BT-50. (141 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Peugeot RCZ should accelerate faster than 2012 Mazda BT-50.
Because 2012 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Peugeot RCZ. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2012 Mazda BT-50 | 2011 Peugeot RCZ | |
| Make | Mazda | Peugeot |
| Model | BT-50 | RCZ |
| Year Released | 2012 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2500 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 141 HP | 163 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 4287 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1845 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1359 mm |
