2012 Mazda CX-9 vs. 1986 Acura Integra
To start off, 2012 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Acura Integra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Acura Integra would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 148 more horse power than 1986 Acura Integra. (125 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1986 Acura Integra.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mazda CX-9 (366 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 227 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Acura Integra. (139 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 2012 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Acura Integra.
Compare all specifications:
2012 Mazda CX-9 | 1986 Acura Integra | |
Make | Mazda | Acura |
Model | CX-9 | Integra |
Year Released | 2012 | 1986 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3700 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 273 HP | 125 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 366 Nm | 139 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | 6-speed shiftable automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5085 mm | 4355 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1935 mm | 1665 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1727 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2875 mm | 2520 mm |