2012 Mazda CX-9 vs. 2004 Dodge Neon
To start off, 2012 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Dodge Neon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Dodge Neon would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 159 more horse power than 2004 Dodge Neon. (114 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 2004 Dodge Neon.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mazda CX-9 (366 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 214 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Dodge Neon. (152 Nm @ 4900 RPM). This means 2012 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Dodge Neon.
Compare all specifications:
2012 Mazda CX-9 | 2004 Dodge Neon | |
Make | Mazda | Dodge |
Model | CX-9 | Neon |
Year Released | 2012 | 2004 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3700 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 273 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 366 Nm | 152 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | 6-speed shiftable automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5085 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1935 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1727 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2875 mm | 2650 mm |