2012 Mazda CX-9 vs. 2008 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2012 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Ford Ecosport. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Ford Ecosport would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP) has 164 more horse power than 2008 Ford Ecosport. (109 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 2008 Ford Ecosport.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Mazda CX-9 has automatic transmission and 2008 Ford Ecosport has manual transmission. 2008 Ford Ecosport will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Mazda CX-9 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2012 Mazda CX-9 | 2008 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Mazda | Ford |
| Model | CX-9 | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 2012 | 2008 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3700 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 273 HP | 109 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | 6-speed shiftable automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5085 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1935 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1727 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2875 mm | 2490 mm |
