2012 Mercedes-Benz CLS vs. 1982 Mazda 626
To start off, 2012 Mercedes-Benz CLS is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 4,663 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Mercedes-Benz CLS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mercedes-Benz CLS weights approximately 845 kg more than 1982 Mazda 626.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2012 Mercedes-Benz CLS | 1982 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Mazda |
Model | CLS | 626 |
Year Released | 2012 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4663 cc | 1586 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 402 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | 7-speed shiftable automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1890 kg | 1045 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1882 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1417 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2875 mm | 2520 mm |