2012 Mercedes-Benz SL vs. 1994 Xedos 6
To start off, 2012 Mercedes-Benz SL is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Xedos 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Xedos 6 would be higher. At 3,498 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Mercedes-Benz SL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mercedes-Benz SL (311 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 205 more horse power than 1994 Xedos 6. (106 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mercedes-Benz SL should accelerate faster than 1994 Xedos 6.
Because 2012 Mercedes-Benz SL is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Mercedes-Benz SL. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Xedos 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mercedes-Benz SL (360 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 222 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Xedos 6. (138 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2012 Mercedes-Benz SL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Xedos 6.
Compare all specifications:
2012 Mercedes-Benz SL | 1994 Xedos 6 | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Xedos |
Model | SL | 6 |
Year Released | 2012 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3498 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 311 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 360 Nm | 138 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4900 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | 7-speed shiftable automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4582 mm | 4570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1298 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2620 mm |