2012 Mitsubishi Galant vs. 2003 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2012 Mitsubishi Galant is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mitsubishi Galant is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Ranger weights approximately 180 kg more than 2012 Mitsubishi Galant.
Because 2003 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Mitsubishi Galant. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2012 Mitsubishi Galant | 2003 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Ford |
| Model | Galant | Ranger |
| Year Released | 2012 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2400 cc | 2300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 160 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | 4-speed shiftable automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 1720 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4854 mm | 5090 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1839 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1471 mm | 1750 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2751 mm | 3010 mm |
