2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV vs. 2009 Nissan Pixo
To start off, 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Nissan Pixo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Nissan Pixo would be higher.
Because 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Pixo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV | 2009 Nissan Pixo | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Nissan |
| Model | i-MiEV | Pixo |
| Year Released | 2012 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 68 HP |
| Fuel Type | Electric | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Single Speed | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3678 mm | 3580 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1585 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1615 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2360 mm |
