2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV vs. 2011 Audi A3
To start off, 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2011 Audi A3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2011 Audi A3 would be higher.
Because 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV | 2011 Audi A3 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Audi |
| Model | i-MiEV | A3 |
| Year Released | 2012 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 138 HP |
| Fuel Type | Electric | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Single Speed | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
