2012 Mitsubishi Lancer vs. 2010 Volvo C30
To start off, 2012 Mitsubishi Lancer is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Volvo C30. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Volvo C30 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mitsubishi Lancer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mitsubishi Lancer (291 HP) has 177 more horse power than 2010 Volvo C30. (114 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mitsubishi Lancer should accelerate faster than 2010 Volvo C30.
Because 2012 Mitsubishi Lancer is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Volvo C30. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mitsubishi Lancer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mitsubishi Lancer (406 Nm) has 136 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Volvo C30. (270 Nm). This means 2012 Mitsubishi Lancer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Volvo C30.
Compare all specifications:
2012 Mitsubishi Lancer | 2010 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Volvo |
Model | Lancer | C30 |
Year Released | 2012 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2000 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 291 HP | 114 HP |
Torque | 406 Nm | 270 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | AWD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4496 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1811 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1481 mm | 1448 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2649 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 60 L |