2012 Nissan Murano vs. 2011 Holden Epica
To start off, 2012 Nissan Murano is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2011 Holden Epica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2011 Holden Epica would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Nissan Murano is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Nissan Murano (260 HP) has 107 more horse power than 2011 Holden Epica. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Murano should accelerate faster than 2011 Holden Epica.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Nissan Murano (325 Nm) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Holden Epica. (237 Nm). This means 2012 Nissan Murano will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
| 2012 Nissan Murano | 2011 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Nissan | Holden |
| Model | Murano | Epica |
| Year Released | 2012 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Crossover | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3500 cc | 2492 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 260 HP | 153 HP |
| Torque | 325 Nm | 237 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | CVT | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4823 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1882 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1727 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2824 mm | 2700 mm |
