2012 Nissan Note vs. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2012 Nissan Note is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee (195 HP) has 106 more horse power than 2012 Nissan Note. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 2012 Nissan Note. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 748 kg more than 2012 Nissan Note. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 2012 Nissan Note | 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
| Make | Nissan | Jeep |
| Model | Note | Grand Cherokee |
| Year Released | 2012 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1386 cc | 3966 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 195 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1052 kg | 1800 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4083 mm | 4610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1691 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2700 mm |
