2012 Nissan Xterra vs. 2004 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2012 Nissan Xterra is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford Ecosport. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford Ecosport would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Nissan Xterra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Nissan Xterra (261 HP) has 118 more horse power than 2004 Ford Ecosport. (143 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Xterra should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Ecosport.
Because 2012 Nissan Xterra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Ford Ecosport. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Xterra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2012 Nissan Xterra | 2004 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Nissan | Ford |
Model | Xterra | Ecosport |
Year Released | 2012 | 2004 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4000 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 261 HP | 143 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | 6-speed manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4539 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1849 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1902 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2490 mm |