2012 Opel Ampera vs. 1981 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 2012 Opel Ampera is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Opel Ampera weights approximately 617 kg more than 1981 Mazda Cosmo.
Because 1981 Mazda Cosmo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Mazda Cosmo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Opel Ampera, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2012 Opel Ampera | 1981 Mazda Cosmo | |
| Make | Opel | Mazda |
| Model | Ampera | Cosmo |
| Year Released | 2012 | 1981 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 102 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Single Speed | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1715 kg | 1098 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4498 mm | 4670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1788 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1438 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2685 mm | 2620 mm |
