2012 Opel Ampera vs. 2001 Opel Omega
To start off, 2012 Opel Ampera is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Opel Omega would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Opel Omega weights approximately 19 kg more than 2012 Opel Ampera.
Because 2001 Opel Omega is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Opel Omega. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Opel Ampera, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2012 Opel Ampera | 2001 Opel Omega | |
| Make | Opel | Opel |
| Model | Ampera | Omega |
| Year Released | 2012 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 142 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Single Speed | Automatic |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1715 kg | 1734 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4498 mm | 4900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1788 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1438 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2685 mm | 2840 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 75 L |
