2012 Opel Combo vs. 2004 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2012 Opel Combo is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford Ecosport. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford Ecosport would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Ecosport (143 HP) has 54 more horse power than 2012 Opel Combo. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 2012 Opel Combo.
Because 2004 Ford Ecosport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Opel Combo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ecosport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2004 Ford Ecosport has automatic transmission and 2012 Opel Combo has manual transmission. 2012 Opel Combo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Ford Ecosport will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2012 Opel Combo | 2004 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Opel | Ford |
Model | Combo | Ecosport |
Year Released | 2012 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1364 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 143 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2490 mm |