2012 Peugeot 207 vs. 2013 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XF is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2012 Peugeot 207. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2012 Peugeot 207 would be higher. At 2,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jaguar XF (335 HP) has 214 more horse power than 2012 Peugeot 207. (121 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 2012 Peugeot 207.
Because 2013 Jaguar XF is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Peugeot 207. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XF will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2012 Peugeot 207 | 2013 Jaguar XF | |
| Make | Peugeot | Jaguar |
| Model | 207 | XF |
| Year Released | 2012 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1600 cc | 2995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 121 HP | 335 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4044 mm | 4961 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1972 mm | 2053 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1397 mm | 1460 mm |
