2012 Peugeot 3008 vs. 2013 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2013 Volvo XC60 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2012 Peugeot 3008. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2012 Peugeot 3008 would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Volvo XC60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volvo XC60 (237 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 2012 Peugeot 3008. (118 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volvo XC60 should accelerate faster than 2012 Peugeot 3008.
Because 2012 Peugeot 3008 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Volvo XC60. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Peugeot 3008 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Volvo XC60 (320 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 160 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Peugeot 3008. (160 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2013 Volvo XC60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Peugeot 3008.
Compare all specifications:
2012 Peugeot 3008 | 2013 Volvo XC60 | |
Make | Peugeot | Volvo |
Model | 3008 | XC60 |
Year Released | 2012 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 3200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 237 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 160 Nm | 320 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 11.8 seconds | 9.7 seconds |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4365 mm | 4627 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1837 mm | 1891 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1639 mm | 1713 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2613 mm | 2774 mm |