2012 Peugeot 508 vs. 1978 Volvo 260
To start off, 2012 Peugeot 508 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Volvo 260. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Volvo 260 would be higher. At 2,664 cc (6 cylinders), 1978 Volvo 260 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Peugeot 508 (161 HP) has 15 more horse power than 1978 Volvo 260. (146 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2012 Peugeot 508 should accelerate faster than 1978 Volvo 260.
Because 1978 Volvo 260 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Volvo 260. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Peugeot 508, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1978 Volvo 260 has automatic transmission and 2012 Peugeot 508 has manual transmission. 2012 Peugeot 508 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1978 Volvo 260 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2012 Peugeot 508 | 1978 Volvo 260 | |
Make | Peugeot | Volvo |
Model | 508 | 260 |
Year Released | 2012 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2000 cc | 2664 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 161 HP | 146 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel / Electric Hybrid | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4823 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1864 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1525 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2815 mm | 2660 mm |