2012 Peugeot 508 vs. 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma
To start off, 2012 Peugeot 508 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma would be higher. At 2,554 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Peugeot 508 (161 HP) has 63 more horse power than 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma. (98 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2012 Peugeot 508 should accelerate faster than 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma.
Because 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Peugeot 508, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma has automatic transmission and 2012 Peugeot 508 has manual transmission. 2012 Peugeot 508 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2012 Peugeot 508 | 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma | |
| Make | Peugeot | Mitsubishi |
| Model | 508 | Sigma |
| Year Released | 2012 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2000 cc | 2554 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 161 HP | 98 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel / Electric Hybrid | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4823 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1864 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1525 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2815 mm | 2520 mm |
