2012 Renault Grand Scenic vs. 2013 Mazda CX-05
To start off, 2013 Mazda CX-05 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2012 Renault Grand Scenic. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2012 Renault Grand Scenic would be higher. Both 2012 Renault Grand Scenic and 2013 Mazda CX-05 are equipped with a 1,998 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mazda CX-05 (153 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 2012 Renault Grand Scenic. (133 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mazda CX-05 should accelerate faster than 2012 Renault Grand Scenic. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mazda CX-05 weights approximately 43 kg more than 2012 Renault Grand Scenic. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mazda CX-05 (203 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Renault Grand Scenic. (191 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2013 Mazda CX-05 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Renault Grand Scenic. 2013 Mazda CX-05 has automatic transmission and 2012 Renault Grand Scenic has manual transmission. 2012 Renault Grand Scenic will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Mazda CX-05 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2012 Renault Grand Scenic | 2013 Mazda CX-05 | |
| Make | Renault | Mazda |
| Model | Grand Scenic | CX-05 |
| Year Released | 2012 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 133 HP | 153 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 191 Nm | 203 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 82.7 mm | 83 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 93 mm | 91 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 13.0 : 1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1512 kg | 1555 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4555 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 2165 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1710 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 58 L |
