2012 Saab 03-Sep vs. 2002 Ford Lynx
To start off, 2012 Saab 03-Sep is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Lynx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Lynx would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Saab 03-Sep is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Saab 03-Sep (180 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 2002 Ford Lynx. (108 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2012 Saab 03-Sep should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Lynx.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Saab 03-Sep (400 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 255 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford Lynx. (145 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2012 Saab 03-Sep will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford Lynx. 2002 Ford Lynx has automatic transmission and 2012 Saab 03-Sep has manual transmission. 2012 Saab 03-Sep will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Ford Lynx will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2012 Saab 03-Sep | 2002 Ford Lynx | |
| Make | Saab | Ford |
| Model | 03-Sep | Lynx |
| Year Released | 2012 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2000 cc | 1596 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 400 Nm | 145 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | 6-speed manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
