2012 Saab 03-Sep vs. 2010 Peugeot 5008
To start off, 2012 Saab 03-Sep is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Peugeot 5008. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Peugeot 5008 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Saab 03-Sep is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Saab 03-Sep (220 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 2010 Peugeot 5008. (108 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2012 Saab 03-Sep should accelerate faster than 2010 Peugeot 5008.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Saab 03-Sep (349 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 109 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Peugeot 5008. (240 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 2012 Saab 03-Sep will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Peugeot 5008. 2010 Peugeot 5008 has automatic transmission and 2012 Saab 03-Sep has manual transmission. 2012 Saab 03-Sep will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Peugeot 5008 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2012 Saab 03-Sep | 2010 Peugeot 5008 | |
Make | Saab | Peugeot |
Model | 03-Sep | 5008 |
Year Released | 2012 | 2010 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2000 cc | 1560 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 349 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Flex Fuel | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | 6-speed manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |