2012 SsangYong Chairman W vs. 2003 Audi A6
To start off, 2012 SsangYong Chairman W is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Audi A6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Audi A6 would be higher. At 4,966 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 SsangYong Chairman W is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 SsangYong Chairman W (302 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 2003 Audi A6. (217 HP @ 6300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2012 SsangYong Chairman W should accelerate faster than 2003 Audi A6.
Because 2003 Audi A6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 SsangYong Chairman W. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2012 SsangYong Chairman W | 2003 Audi A6 | |
| Make | SsangYong | Audi |
| Model | Chairman W | A6 |
| Year Released | 2012 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4966 cc | 2976 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 302 HP | 217 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Top Speed | 250 km/hour | 238 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | 7-speed automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4800 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1895 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1495 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2970 mm | 2430 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.3 L/100km | 11.5 L/100km |
