2012 Toyota Camry vs. 2003 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2012 Toyota Camry is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Falcon (220 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 2012 Toyota Camry. (200 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 2012 Toyota Camry. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Toyota Camry weights approximately 35 kg more than 2003 Ford Falcon.
Because 2003 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Toyota Camry, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2012 Toyota Camry | 2003 Ford Falcon | |
| Make | Toyota | Ford |
| Model | Camry | Falcon |
| Year Released | 2012 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2500 cc | 3984 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 220 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 4900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | CVT | Automatic |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 1515 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4806 mm | 4910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1821 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1471 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2776 mm | 2800 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 59 L |
