2012 Toyota FJ Cruiser vs. 2010 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2012 Toyota FJ Cruiser is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Ford Ecosport. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Ford Ecosport would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Toyota FJ Cruiser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Toyota FJ Cruiser (260 HP) has 117 more horse power than 2010 Ford Ecosport. (143 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2012 Toyota FJ Cruiser should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford Ecosport.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Ford Ecosport has automatic transmission and 2012 Toyota FJ Cruiser has manual transmission. 2012 Toyota FJ Cruiser will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Ford Ecosport will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2012 Toyota FJ Cruiser | 2010 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Toyota | Ford |
Model | FJ Cruiser | Ecosport |
Year Released | 2012 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4000 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 260 HP | 143 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4671 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1905 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1811 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2490 mm |