2012 Toyota Highlander vs. 2013 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2013 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2012 Toyota Highlander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2012 Toyota Highlander would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Toyota Highlander (280 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 2013 Toyota 4Runner. (266 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2012 Toyota Highlander should accelerate faster than 2013 Toyota 4Runner. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 79 kg more than 2012 Toyota Highlander.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2012 Toyota Highlander | 2013 Toyota 4Runner | |
| Make | Toyota | Toyota |
| Model | Highlander | 4Runner |
| Year Released | 2012 | 2013 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3500 cc | 4000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 280 HP | 266 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | AWD | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | CVT | 5-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2105 kg | 2184 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4796 mm | 4820 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1925 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2789 mm | 2790 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 8.4 L/100km | 9.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 8.4 L/100km | 12.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 87 L |
