2012 Volkswagen Eos vs. 1979 Mazda 626
To start off, 2012 Volkswagen Eos is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Volkswagen Eos is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volkswagen Eos weights approximately 574 kg more than 1979 Mazda 626.
Because 1979 Mazda 626 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Mazda 626. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volkswagen Eos, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2012 Volkswagen Eos | 1979 Mazda 626 | |
| Make | Volkswagen | Mazda |
| Model | Eos | 626 |
| Year Released | 2012 | 1979 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2000 cc | 1586 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | 6-speed automated manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1619 kg | 1045 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4423 mm | 4310 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1791 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1444 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2578 mm | 2520 mm |
