2012 Volkswagen Sharan vs. 2010 Volvo C30
To start off, 2012 Volkswagen Sharan is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Volvo C30. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Volvo C30 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volkswagen Sharan weights approximately 339 kg more than 2010 Volvo C30.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Volvo C30 (350 Nm) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Volkswagen Sharan. (280 Nm). This means 2010 Volvo C30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Volkswagen Sharan. 2012 Volkswagen Sharan has automatic transmission and 2010 Volvo C30 has manual transmission. 2010 Volvo C30 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Volkswagen Sharan will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2012 Volkswagen Sharan | 2010 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Volkswagen | Volvo |
Model | Sharan | C30 |
Year Released | 2012 | 2010 |
Body Type | Minivan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 1973 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 280 Nm | 350 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1790 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4854 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1904 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1448 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2919 mm | 2639 mm |