2012 Volvo C30 vs. 2006 Jaguar X-Type
To start off, 2012 Volvo C30 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Jaguar X-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Jaguar X-Type would be higher. At 2,495 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Jaguar X-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Jaguar X-Type weights approximately 119 kg more than 2012 Volvo C30.
Because 2006 Jaguar X-Type is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Volvo C30. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Jaguar X-Type will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Jaguar X-Type has automatic transmission and 2012 Volvo C30 has manual transmission. 2012 Volvo C30 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Jaguar X-Type will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2012 Volvo C30 | 2006 Jaguar X-Type | |
| Make | Volvo | Jaguar |
| Model | C30 | X-Type |
| Year Released | 2012 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2000 cc | 2495 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 193 HP |
| Fuel Type | Flex Fuel | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | 6-speed manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1451 kg | 1570 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4252 mm | 4680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1783 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1448 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2639 mm | 2720 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 61 L |
