2012 Volvo C30 vs. 2010 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2012 Volvo C30 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Mazda Tribute. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Mazda Tribute would be higher. At 2,483 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda Tribute is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo C30 weights approximately 326 kg more than 2010 Mazda Tribute.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Volvo C30 (350 Nm) has 166 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Mazda Tribute. (184 Nm). This means 2012 Volvo C30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Mazda Tribute.
Compare all specifications:
2012 Volvo C30 | 2010 Mazda Tribute | |
Make | Volvo | Mazda |
Model | C30 | Tribute |
Year Released | 2012 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2400 cc | 2483 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 350 Nm | 184 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1451 kg | 1125 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4252 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1783 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1448 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2639 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 57 L |