2012 Volvo C70 vs. 1988 Ford Fairlane
To start off, 2012 Volvo C70 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 4,089 cc (6 cylinders), 1988 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo C70 weights approximately 110 kg more than 1988 Ford Fairlane.
Because 1988 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1988 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volvo C70, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Volvo C70 (400 Nm @ 1250 RPM) has 96 more torque (in Nm) than 1988 Ford Fairlane. (304 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2012 Volvo C70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1988 Ford Fairlane.
Compare all specifications:
| 2012 Volvo C70 | 1988 Ford Fairlane | |
| Make | Volvo | Ford |
| Model | C70 | Fairlane |
| Year Released | 2012 | 1988 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2400 cc | 4089 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 138 HP |
| Torque | 400 Nm | 304 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1250 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | 5-speed shiftable automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1740 kg | 1630 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4582 mm | 5020 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1836 mm | 1870 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2639 mm | 2950 mm |
