2012 Volvo C70 vs. 1999 Mitsubishi Space Wagon
To start off, 2012 Volvo C70 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mitsubishi Space Wagon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mitsubishi Space Wagon would be higher. At 2,400 cc (5 cylinders), 2012 Volvo C70 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo C70 weights approximately 230 kg more than 1999 Mitsubishi Space Wagon.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Volvo C70 (400 Nm @ 1250 RPM) has 170 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Mitsubishi Space Wagon. (230 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2012 Volvo C70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Mitsubishi Space Wagon.
Compare all specifications:
2012 Volvo C70 | 1999 Mitsubishi Space Wagon | |
Make | Volvo | Mitsubishi |
Model | C70 | Space Wagon |
Year Released | 2012 | 1999 |
Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2400 cc | 2351 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 400 Nm | 230 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1250 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | 5-speed shiftable automatic | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1740 kg | 1510 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4582 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1836 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2639 mm | 2790 mm |