2012 Volvo S60 vs. 2004 Audi A6
To start off, 2012 Volvo S60 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Audi A6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Audi A6 would be higher. At 2,671 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi A6 weights approximately 111 kg more than 2012 Volvo S60.
Because 2004 Audi A6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Volvo S60. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Volvo S60 (400 Nm @ 1250 RPM) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Audi A6. (350 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2012 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Audi A6.
Compare all specifications:
| 2012 Volvo S60 | 2004 Audi A6 | |
| Make | Volvo | Audi |
| Model | S60 | A6 |
| Year Released | 2012 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2400 cc | 2671 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 5 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 248 HP |
| Torque | 400 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1250 RPM | 1800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | 6-speed shiftable automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1609 kg | 1720 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4628 mm | 4800 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1864 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1483 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2776 mm | 2770 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 67 L | 70 L |
