2012 Volvo S60 vs. 2009 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2012 Volvo S60 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Ford Ecosport. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Ford Ecosport would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Volvo S60 (325 HP) has 182 more horse power than 2009 Ford Ecosport. (143 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2012 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 2009 Ford Ecosport.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2012 Volvo S60 | 2009 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Volvo | Ford |
| Model | S60 | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 2012 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3000 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 325 HP | 143 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | AWD | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | 6-speed shiftable automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4628 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1864 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1483 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2776 mm | 2490 mm |
