2012 Volvo S80 vs. 2003 Acura RSX
To start off, 2012 Volvo S80 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Acura RSX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Acura RSX would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Acura RSX is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo S80 weights approximately 387 kg more than 2003 Acura RSX.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Volvo S80 (240 Nm) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Acura RSX. (191 Nm). This means 2012 Volvo S80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Acura RSX.
Compare all specifications:
2012 Volvo S80 | 2003 Acura RSX | |
Make | Volvo | Acura |
Model | S80 | RSX |
Year Released | 2012 | 2003 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1600 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 160 HP |
Torque | 240 Nm | 191 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | 6-speed shiftable automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1609 kg | 1222 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4628 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1864 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1483 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2776 mm | 2540 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 67 L | 50 L |