2012 Volvo XC70 vs. 2013 Mercedes-Benz E

To start off, 2013 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2012 Volvo XC70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2012 Volvo XC70 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Volvo XC70 (300 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 2013 Mercedes-Benz E. (298 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2012 Volvo XC70 should accelerate faster than 2013 Mercedes-Benz E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mercedes-Benz E weights approximately 42 kg more than 2012 Volvo XC70.

With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Volvo XC70 (440 Nm @ 2100 RPM) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mercedes-Benz E. (370 Nm @ 5250 RPM). This means 2012 Volvo XC70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mercedes-Benz E.

Compare all specifications:

2012 Volvo XC70 2013 Mercedes-Benz E
Make Volvo Mercedes-Benz
Model XC70 E
Year Released 2012 2013
Body Type SUV Station Wagon
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3000 cc 3500 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line dual-disk rotary
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 300 HP 298 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 6500 RPM
Torque 440 Nm 370 Nm
Torque RPM 2100 RPM 5250 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline - Premium
Drive Type AWD 4WD
Transmission Type 6-speed shiftable automatic 5-speed shiftable automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1883 kg 1925 kg
Vehicle Length 4838 mm 4895 mm
Vehicle Width 1862 mm 2071 mm
Vehicle Height 1604 mm 1517 mm
Wheelbase Size 2815 mm 2874 mm
Fuel Consumption Highway 10.2 L/100km 7.3 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 13.8 L/100km 11.2 L/100km