2013 Cadillac ESCALADE vs. 2013 Mazda CX-09
To start off, both 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE and 2013 Mazda CX-09 were released in the same year (2013). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE (327 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 2013 Mazda CX-09. (269 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE should accelerate faster than 2013 Mazda CX-09. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE weights approximately 724 kg more than 2013 Mazda CX-09. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Mazda CX-09. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE (498 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 132 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mazda CX-09. (366 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mazda CX-09.
Compare all specifications:
| 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE | 2013 Mazda CX-09 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
| Model | ESCALADE | CX-09 |
| Year Released | 2013 | 2013 |
| Body Type | SUV | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6000 cc | 3726 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 327 HP | 269 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Torque | 498 Nm | 366 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4100 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 102 mm | 95 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.8 | 10.3:1 |
| Fuel Type | Electric | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | 4-speed automatic | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2786 kg | 2062 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5144 mm | 5108 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2007 mm | 1936 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1928 mm | 1728 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2947 mm | 2875 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.2 L/100km | 9 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 11.8 L/100km | 12.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 76 L |
