2013 Dodge CHARGER R/T PLUS vs. 2013 Dodge CHARGER R/T MAX

To start off, both 2013 Dodge CHARGER R/T PLUS and 2013 Dodge CHARGER R/T MAX were released in the same year (2013). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. Both 2013 Dodge CHARGER R/T PLUS and 2013 Dodge CHARGER R/T MAX are equipped with a 5,700 cc engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 365 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 536 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.

Compare all specifications:

2013 Dodge CHARGER R/T PLUS 2013 Dodge CHARGER R/T MAX
Make Dodge Dodge
Model CHARGER CHARGER
Year Released 2013 2013
Body Type Sedan Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5700 cc 5700 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 365 HP 365 HP
Engine RPM 5250 RPM 5250 RPM
Torque 536 Nm 536 Nm
Torque RPM 4200 RPM 4200 RPM
Engine Bore Size 99 mm 99 mm
Engine Stroke Size 90 mm 90 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type 5-speed automatic 5-speed automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1929 kg 1929 kg
Vehicle Length 5077 mm 5077 mm
Vehicle Width 1905 mm 1905 mm
Vehicle Height 1482 mm 1482 mm
Wheelbase Size 3052 mm 3052 mm
Fuel Consumption 8 L/100km 8 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 13.5 L/100km 13.5 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 72 L 72 L