2013 Dodge CHARGER vs. 2013 Toyota Matrix
To start off, both 2013 Dodge CHARGER and 2013 Toyota Matrix were released in the same year (2013). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Dodge CHARGER is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Dodge CHARGER (288 HP @ 6350 RPM) has 158 more horse power than 2013 Toyota Matrix. (130 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2013 Dodge CHARGER should accelerate faster than 2013 Toyota Matrix. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Dodge CHARGER weights approximately 528 kg more than 2013 Toyota Matrix. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Dodge CHARGER is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Dodge CHARGER. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Matrix, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Dodge CHARGER (353 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 179 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Toyota Matrix. (174 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2013 Dodge CHARGER will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Toyota Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
2013 Dodge CHARGER | 2013 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Dodge | Toyota |
Model | CHARGER | Matrix |
Year Released | 2013 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3600 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 288 HP | 130 HP |
Engine RPM | 6350 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 353 Nm | 174 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 88 mm |
Fuel Type | Flex Fuel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | 8-speed automatic | 5-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1813 kg | 1285 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5077 mm | 4365 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1905 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1482 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3052 mm | 2600 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 6.4 L/100km | 6.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 10.9 L/100km | 7.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 50 L |