2013 Mini Cooper vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, both 2013 Mini Cooper and 2013 Mini Countryman were released in the same year (2013). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mini Countryman weights approximately 155 kg more than 2013 Mini Cooper.
Because 2013 Mini Cooper is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Mini Cooper. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Countryman, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 155 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
2013 Mini Cooper | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
Make | Mini | Mini |
Model | Cooper | Countryman |
Year Released | 2013 | 2013 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 155 Nm | 155 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 77 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85 mm | 85 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | 6-speed manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1185 kg | 1340 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3723 mm | 4097 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1892 mm | 1993 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1407 mm | 1561 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2467 mm | 2595 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 5.2 L/100km | 5.5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 6.9 L/100km | 7.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 47 L |